Displaying 551 - 582 of 582
Displaying 551 - 582 of 582
|Rule Change ID||Submitted||From||Comment|
|83||June 25, 2021||Nick|| |
Unless I am missing something, rule 6.D.7 does not require an out call at any time.
|283||July 7, 2022||Julia|| |
Unnecessary change. This change does not need to implemented.
|569||July 9, 2022||Beth|| |
Unnecessary change. This change might be necessary if this 'glaring loophole' was being exploited but, it's not (as documented in the submission). If players thought they could gain some sort of an advantage by running onto the court late to a rally in progress, it would be happening more and more frequently. Referees are not having difficulty handling this 'loophole' (which would be a valid/necessary reason to make a rule change) primarily because it isn't being exploited but also because referees have rules that allow them to handle the situation if/when it occurs.
|286||July 14, 2022||Tony|| |
Unnecessary rule change.
|266||July 6, 2022||Beth|| |
Unnecessary rule change. Several rules already address NVZ infractions and timing (e.g. 8.E and 9.C).
|369||July 19, 2022||Kyle|| |
Unnecessary to add. Already limited by one hand uncovered. If individuals are experiencing weak returns, the server either needs to move up or the returners need to move down (in ratings).
|97||June 28, 2021||Vaunette|| |
Upon retirement of a match, points that were scored should stand. For example, if the game score was 8-6 once a individual/team retires the score should NOT suddenly become 11-0.
|371||July 7, 2022||Maria|| |
We are spending much too much time on this 'Am I the Right Receiver?' question. It has come up on way too many Referee Conference Calls. Maybe we just need to go to one question allowed regarding positioning 'Am I good?' or 'Are we good?'
|273||July 13, 2022||Chuck|| |
We don't want rally scoring.
|404||July 13, 2022||Brian L|| |
We have spent the good part of three hours during the last two meetings discussing player “position” questions to referees during matches. Holy smokes? How do non-refereed matches get around these questions? The problem is as I see it is that the referees are the problem. This is proven by the simple fact that we have spent most of two meetings discussing questions that cause consternation and confusion even amongst ourselves of which most are experienced referees!
In my mind, referees should not be trying to play “Jeopardy” with the players by justifying “violations” with the expedient of “you didn’t ask the right question at the right time in the right sequence”! This makes us not only look stupid … but the villain as well. This is completely nuts! The solution is right before us … ANSWER ALL THE QUESTIONS ASKED AND UNASKED! It is our job to make sure players are in the right positions and the correct server but ONLY when they ask!. How simple is that? Do the players have a responsibility as well? … Yes of course they do. Since every time the referee has to correct player positions it interrupts the flow of the game. This is now a new issue. The referee can resolve this “delay of game tactic” simply with the warning system … i.e. verbal, TW and TF with a +or- point.
In summary … Don’t pussy foot around … if a player asks if they are in the right position tell them yes or no including the score. These players are not stupid … they know the rules. Why do we as referees want to catch them in an incorrect position, incorrect server? Is it good for the game? Does it play well with the spectators? If it is confusing to the referees, it is certainly confusing to the players and spectators. The enjoyment, the fairness and the honor of the game is certainly undermined when the referee is not forthcoming regarding player position/server questions.
|536||July 6, 2022||Vicki|| |
We have worked hard to remove the referee from becoming part of the match and be there to keep score and apply rules. These rules include player positions. If we are going to insure players do not break position rules, what other rules can we use this same methodology? If we are going to keep players from being in the wrong position, why don’t we remove the position requirement rule. Players designate which side they will start from and stay there. The serve would alternate between the players. The referee would insure the serve is served from the side that matches their score. (Or not). Hopefully they can remember where they started from. The requirement to call the score “twice” is just another insertion into the game and very difficult to do in noisy settings for a single call, twice will be more frustrating for both the players and the referee. This rule change is for a small subset of teams that can’t seem to keep their thoughts together. Why add major frustration for all involved by calling the score twice for EACH rally during a match. Please reconsider……
|275||April 9, 2022||Judy|| |
Wear eye protection at all Times. I never play without it.
|275||July 11, 2022||Kevin|| |
Wear safety glasses. If you are at risk of a concussion from a pickleball you need to pick another sport. If you don't like people hitting the ball at you find a different group to play with. As a matter of etiquette you certainly shouldn't target above the shoulders but sometimes the ball doesn't go exactly where you intend it to go.
|290||June 9, 2022||tom|| |
Well, there is a point to be made here. However, I've always liked this rule - for a fairly selfish reason. It's unique to pickleball. Pickleball is not tennis! It's one of our rules that separates us from tennis. I disagree with the proposed rule change.
|570||July 13, 2022||Darla|| |
Wellll, the ATP opportunity exists because the team that will need to defend the ATP sent a risky shot at a such a wide angle that the ATP shot became possible. Don't punish the ATP team for a "mistake" that the other team created -- setting up the shot opportunity. If you don't think there should be ATP's, then don't set up that shot by setting the previous shot up to bounce at a deep angle that far off the court.
|526||July 11, 2022||Dotti|| |
what about revealing sports bras? Men players and even women try not to sign up with the “breast” distraction.
|389||July 9, 2022||William|| |
What about when the ball hits right next to the line, covering part of the line, but not actually touching the line? It will often appear "in" depending on where you are on the court, especially if you are the person who hit the ball. Here is a link from the USPA on this issue:
Sort of gives a mixed message. Probably should be addressed in giving guidance.
|320||May 25, 2022||DARIN|| |
What happens if the ball isn't held high enough? Is it a fault? The last things we need are more of these unnecessary rule changes.
|291||April 21, 2022||Lori|| |
What if best of both worlds
Then it sounds correct ‘to start’ and is correct w the 0-0-2
|386||July 11, 2022||Kevin|| |
Whether there is a replay is dependent upon whether it is a refereed or nonrefereed game.
In either instance once the serve has been struck if a player stops play because of an incorrect score being called it will be a fault. This is a significant change from previous versions of the rule. Last year's rule said that the player could stop play up until the time the third shot was struck. Prior to that it had to be before the ball was returned. Each of those definitions has its own set of problems, I happen to agree with the 2022 wording as being the most workable, but I won't comment further on what the cutoff should be to stop play. It does not matter whether the server or the referee called the score it is a fault. It doesn't matter if the score is correct or incorrect it is a fault.
The rule does not state what happens if an incorrect score is called. To determine what happens it is important to know who made the error and what affect it had on play.
If the referee makes the error it is much more likely that a replay will occur because it is the referee's error. If the serving team faults because the serving team called the score wrong then there typically won't be a replay. In the first instance the serving team should not be faulted for the referee's error. In the second instance the serving team "owns" the error because they are the ones that made the call.
There may be instances where the receiving team will have a legitimate claim to a replay due to an incorrect score called but the serving team does not in game without a referee.
|372||July 13, 2022||Scott|| |
While I agree with the sentiment, it's already difficult to count, in game, which bounce it is. Applying too many rules to this particular bounce or that particular bounce becomes unworkable/unplayable. But, yes, I've heard of many injuries from backpeddling and falling and getting hurt.
|86||July 5, 2021||Don|| |
Why should my opponent have more rights to my court space than I do? Under certain conditions (hitting the ball then crossing, following the ball back over after backspin) it is reasonable to allow a player to cross into my court space. BUT, this does not mean that I need to concede any space on my side of the net. You play on your side and I'll play on mine.
|26||June 26, 2021||Bill|| |
With the exception of medically necessary hearing aids, I see no reason that players should be allowed to wear earbuds. How would you know if the person was receiving constant coaching via cell phone?
|123||July 4, 2021||Don|| |
With this rule change, we are now allowing players to carry balls on their person and in the event that a ball falls out and the opponents stop play for hinder or safety concerns, we now have to call a fault on them? What if one of the opponents did not see the ball fall out of a pocket and out of habit calls "ball on". Are they now supposed to be faulted for being "habitually safe"? No good can come from allowing players to carry balls on the court.
|536||July 13, 2022||Brooke|| |
Would echo the comments not in favor of these particular proposed changes, especially the proposal to call the score twice. It's laborious without being meaningfully productive and also represents an opportunity for refs to be viewed as unnecessarily interjecting themselves into the match, which could negatively impact overall respect for the role of officiating and although minor, present an essentially fruitless, duplicative challenge to referee accuracy.
|26||June 22, 2021||Andrew|| |
Would have to consider players who are hard of hearing and wear hearing aids for legitimate reason.
|275||April 21, 2022||Gary|| |
Yes on this rule
|219||June 15, 2022||Michael|| |
Yes, I like it. Takes out ambiguity.
|275||May 18, 2022||Jane|| |
Yes, this rule is necessary for player safety! More and more players are deliberately aiming and hitting hard at opponents’ faces. In fact, many then celebrate afterwards for their ‘great’ shot. (See Matt Wright, North Carolina open pro mixed doubles match.) This is dangerous play. Many other sports, such as football, baseball and basketball, have made major changes to ensure head/face safety. Pickleball needs to do the same.
|275||July 15, 2022||Susan|| |
Yes, this rule is needed, especially for face shots. I am 5’2”, I always wear safety glasses. I have played against many men who intentionally aim for my face, and they are usually lower rated (3.5 or less). They admit to me that this is their intention! The better players hit low balls, no problem. If you cannot control your shots, you shouldn’t be hitting so hard up at people’s faces. It is dangerous play.
|372||July 11, 2022||Michelle|| |
You're giving even more of an advantage to the receiving team. They should beat the serving team up to the line, but if the serving team lobs over them because they got up there so quickly, you're going to punish the serving team for a great shot.
|291||July 6, 2022||Maree|| |
You're right about cardinal (counting) and ordinal (sequence) numbers. But I think it should be "first" and "last". With "zero-zero-last" to start the game, "side-out" occurs when you don't score. Then "zero-zero-first", score a point then lose your serve, "one-zero-last" for your second server. First/last represents the order of the servers.
|Rule Change ID||Submitted||From||Comment|